Two RF Microwave Radiation Meter Options: A Broadband Meter OR a Spectrum Analyzer
As one can read below, 0.002 microWatts per square meter (µW/m²) = -85 deciBel-milliWatts (dBm), which is sufficient power output for “5-Bars” of wireless telecommunications service
- A Broadband RF Meter (such as the Safe and Sound Pro II) measures the rate of microwave radiation exposure from all antennas that are transmitting into the area
- A Spectrum Analyzer (such as the RF Explorer 6G COMBO PLUS) determines which wireless carriers are contributing to the rate of microwave radiation exposure into the area. This analysis requires inspecting Wireless Frequency Licenses that apply to each specific county: see the County Depth Map tab of the Spectrum Omega software. The software lists what frequencies each wireless carriers leases from the FCC in order to transmit RF Microwave radiation pollution into the area. View an example of a county RF Microwave Radiation license list here.
There are two main ways of measuring electromagnetic power through the air:
- A Broadband RF Meter measures power from all frequencies in a defined range as voltage (in Volts/meter) and then calculates RF microwave radiation exposure as power flux density (in µW/m², which is millionths of a Watt flowing through a square meter of area)
- A Spectrum Analyzer measures power from each licensed carrier-specific frequency in a defined range as voltage (Volts/meter) and then calculates the signal strength as Received Signal Strength Indicator — RSSI in dBm — for each carrier-specific frequency.
Option 2 is far better than option 1. That is what current WilsonPro Cell LinQ Meter, listed below, enables for 4G frequencies. Wilson Electronics is releasing an updated spectrum analyzer that can also measure the C-Band (3500-3700 MHz), but that version won’t likely be released until the first quarter of 2023. The latest version of the RF Explorer, the 6G COMBO PLUS Spectrum Analyzer, also listed below, already measures the C-Band (3500-3700 MHz).
The key point is that once a locality is served by any single carrier-specific frequency that provides personal wireless service (i.e. telecommunications service, which is the ability to place an outdoor wireless phone call), then the locality does not have to approve any Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs) that broadcast additional frequencices for wireless information service (i.e. wireless broadband or streaming). This means that if residents of a locality can successfully make outdoor wireless phone calls on frequencies in the 600-900 MHz range, then there is no need for antennas that transmit frequencies above 900 MHz.
WilsonPro Cell LinQ Meter
Link to Cellular Signal Meter Tool Kit – 910055
- Multi-Generation LTE, Cellular, AWS and PCS and C-Band Scanner for 3G, 4G and 5G signals
- Details tower location via GPS coordinates, signal strength (dBm), downlink frequency (MHz), distance to tower (feet)
- Capture, store and export wireless carrier-specific signal strength readings results
- 3-year warranty from date of purchase
- Link to specifications worksheet
Link to RF Explorer 6G COMBO PLUS Spectrum Analyzer
RF Explorer 6G COMBO+ is the line’s most powerful Spectrum Analyzer model, covering the full 6GHz range starting at 50KHz up to 6.1GHz with no gaps or limitations. Compared to the standard 6G Combo model, the new SLIM design offers an outstanding robust enclosure, a more convenient USB connector on the side and larger internal battery capacity.
Key Features
- Spectrum Analyzer mode with Peak Max and Hold, Normal, Overwrite and Averaging modes
- High frequency support covering all range up to 6.1GHz with no gaps.
- Low frequency support from 50KHz covering LF, MF, HF, VHF and UHF
- Internal LNA amplifier and selectable attenuator for additional power range handling.
- Solid metal case with high quality varnished paint
- Pocket size and light weight
- High capacity internal Lithium battery for 10+ hours of continuous run, rechargeable by USB
- Multi-platform Windows/Linux/MacOS Open Source software and API libraries
Narda SRM-3006 is What the Wireless Industy Uses
Nov 9, 2021 Voicemail message from Gerry Spinelli, Narda (L3Harris) re: the Narda SRM-3006 Spectrum Analyzer
Nov 11, 2021 Voicemail message from Tyler, Safe Living Technologies re: the Safe and Sound Pro II
Dr. Andrew A. Marino on the Hazards of EMFs and RF Microwave Radiation
Are SAR measurements useful in your research?
Dr. Marino:
In connection with understanding mobile phone fields, none whatsoever. I think they’re meaningless with regard to that application.
Why are SAR measurements meaningless?
Dr. Marino:
Several reasons. First you need to understand where SAR came from. I was there when SAR was invented. Richard Phillips, Don Justesen, Saul Michaelson, Herman Schwann, these were men who created SAR, whose mind gave rise to it.
And the reason they did was because they were interested in developing microwave ovens and in understanding how to cook meat. And it’s useful for understanding how to cook meat. But it has no application whatsoever, that I have ever seen suggested or advanced, for understanding mobile phones.
SAR works for dead muscle. It has just no applicability in my opinion for live brain.
Why are SAR measurements not applicable to the live brain?
Dr. Marino:
Because the health hazards associated with mobile phone fields have nothing to do with heat. So it makes no sense to say, “I have a really great way of measuring heat” when the measurement of heat is irrelevant to understanding health hazards. Any measurement that you make that has no connection with what you’re interested in is just a waste of time.
SAR can produce a lot of data and when the calculations of SAR are done they can produce beautiful pictures but the pictures are arbitrary and the measurements are meaningless. It’s quite clear that that’s the case.
Prof. Trevor Marshall, PhD States the Truth:
“The brain is not acting as a mass being heated, the brain is acting as a radio receiver.”
Dr. Trevor Marshall: How Radio Waves Make You Sicker |
Dr. Trevor Marshall: Electrosmog Radiation – Effects
Windheim Proves That The Emperor Has No Clothes
Nov 28, 2018: William F. Hammett, Professional Electrical Engineer
|
Nov 28, 2018: Eric Windheim, Certified Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist
Tells the Truth on Nov 28, 2018 in Elk Grove, CA (3:02:23 to 3:07:40)
Biologically-Based RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Guidelines
BioInitiative, 2019: “A scientific benchmark of 30 µW/m² for lowest observed effect level for RF microwave radiation is based on mobile phone base station-level studies. Applying a ten-fold reduction to compensate for the lack of long-term exposure (to provide a safety buffer for chronic exposure) or for children as a sensitive subpopulation yields a 3 to 6 µW/m² RF Microwave Radiation exposure guideline”
Similar scientifically-based RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Guidelines are published by the International Institute for Building-Biology & Ecology:
See BioInitiative RF Color Charts
No Hazard |
Slight Hazard |
Severe Hazard |
Extreme Hazard |
---|---|---|---|
< 0.1 µW/m² |
0.1 µW/m² to 10 µW/m² |
10 µW/m² to 1,000 µW/m² |
> 1,000 µW/m² |
- µW/m² = millionths of a Watt per square meter (a measurement of power flux density)
- Power flux density (PFD) = the amount of electrical power that flows through a unit area: expressed as microWatts (µW) per square meter (m²).
- PFD measures only the rate of electrical power, NOT the total electrical power delivered over time, which requires the rate to be multiplied by the time of exposure and then requires reporting the results in a more relevant unit: µW-seconds/m² or µJoules/m²
- Average µW/m² readings, as specified by the FCC, significantly under-report the levels of pulsed, data-modulated, RF microwave radiation exposures for two reasons —
- Peak RF microwave radiation exposures meter 100x–1000x higher than average RF microwave radiation for data-carrying, modulated, high-crest signals like Wi-Fi, 4G/LTE and 5G because of the duty cycle, inherent in these RF signals. Inexplicably, the FCC RF microwave radiation exposure guidelines only consider average RF microwave radiation exposures, which is a significant error because living organisms’ biology reacts to the sharp changes of RF microwave radiation from zero to peak levels and back again. This is more fully explained here: Palo Alto Whitewashes RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Hazards
- The FCC RF microwave radiation exposure guidelines consider neither the time of exposure nor the total electrical power delivered over time, which is utter nonsense and scientifically unsound. This is more fully explained here: RF Microwave Radiation Counter.
Signal Strength RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Guidelines
dBm (decibel-milliwatts) is an abbreviation for the power ratio in decibels (dB) of the measured power referenced to one milliwatt (1 mW = 1/1,000 of a Watt). It is used in radio, microwave and fiber-optic communication networks as a convenient measure of absolute power because of its capability to express both very large and very small values in a short form. The following data is based on that published in the Cornet ED-85X Manual; the meter’s antenna is centered at 2,450 MHz and can meter RF Microwave Radiation from 700 MHz to 6,000 MHz.
dBm | Power Density | Comparison | See Case No. 18-1051, Mozilla v FCC |
---|---|---|---|
0 dBm | 580,000 µW/m² | 322,000,000x higher | Land of . . . |
-5 dBm | 180,000 µW/m² | 100,000,000x higher |
|
-10 dBm | 58,000 µW/m² | ||
-15 dBm | 18,000 µW/m² | 10,000,000x higher | |
-20 dBm | 5,800 µW/m² | ||
-25 dBm | 1,800 µW/m² | 1,000,000x higher | |
-30 dBm | 580 µW/m² | ||
-35 dBm | 180 µW/m² | 100,000x higher | |
-40 dBm | 58 µW/m² | ||
-45 dBm | 18 µW/m² | 10,000x higher | |
-50 dBm | 5.8 µW/m² | ||
-55 dBm | 1.8 µW/m² | 1,000x higher | |
-60 dBm | 0.58 µW/m² | ||
-65 dBm | 0.18 µW/m² | 100x higher | |
-70 dBm | .058 µW/m² | ||
-75 dBm | .018 µW/m² | 10x higher |
|
-80 dBm | .0058 µW/m² | ||
–85 dBm | 0.0018 µW/m² | 5 Bars on a cell phone | |
-90 dBm | 0.00058 µW/m² | ||
-95 dBm | 0.00018 µW/m² | 1/10 lower | |
-100 dBm | 0.000058 µW/m² | ||
-105 dBm | 0.000018 µW/m² | 1/100 lower | |
-110 dBm | 0.0000058 µW/m² | ||
-115 dBm | 0.0000018 µW/m² | 1/1,000 lower | |
-120 dBm | 0.00000058 µW/m² | ||
-125 dBm | 0.00000018 µW/m² | 1/10,000 lower |
Conclusion: 0.002 µW/m² (-85 dBm) is all the RF microwave radiation that is needed for strong cellular service in a residential neighborhood. A locality can set a maximum power output limit from all frequencies/antennas from a WTF in the public rights-of-way at 0.1 Watt of Effective Radiated Power (ERP) because that provides -85 dBm signal strength at a ½-mile down the street, with five bars on a cell phone and everyone can make a call.
- 0.002 µW/m² is 5 billion (5,000,000,000) times lower than the scientifically-unsound, FCC RF microwave radiation maximum public exposure guideline of 10,000,000 µW/m².
- 0.002 µW/m² is still 2 billion (2,000,000,000) times higher than the PicoWatt (0.000000000001 Watt) electrical rates of power that human cell membranes use in regulating many key biological functions.
The simple math, above, clearly explains why Close Proximity Microwave Radiation Antennas (CPMRA) are hazardous and should not be allowed in public rights-of-way in residential zones.
Typical Signal Strengths
47 CFR 2.1091 – Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: mobile devices.
§ 2.1091
(d) The limits to be used for evaluation are specified in §1.1310 of this chapter. All unlicensed personal communications service (PCS) devices and unlicensed NII devices shall be subject to the limits for general population/uncontrolled exposure.
(1) For purposes of analyzing mobile transmitting devices under the occupational/controlled criteria specified in § 1.1310 of this chapter, time-averaging provisions of the guidelines may be used in conjunction with typical maximum duty factors to determine maximum likely exposure levels.
(2) Time-averaging provisions may not be used in determining typical exposure levels for devices intended for use by consumers in general population/uncontrolled environments as defined in § 1.1310 of this chapter. However, “source-based” time-averaging based on an inherent property or duty-cycle of a device is allowed. An example of this is the determination of exposure from a device that uses digital technology such as a time-division multiple-access (TDMA) scheme for transmission of a signal. In general, maximum average power levels must be used to determine compliance.
FCC RF-EMR Exposure Guideline Differences Among 4G/5G Wavelengths/Frequencies
Year | Organization | Wavelengths | Frequencies | Velocity | Power Density | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(inches) | (MHz) | (mph) | (µW/m²) | |||
1996 | FCC | 22.6 | 600 | 671,000,000 | 4,000,000 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 19.4 | 700 | 671,000,000 | 4,666,667 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 17.0 | 800 | 671,000,000 | 5,333,333 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 15.1 | 900 | 671,000,000 | 6,000,000 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 13.5 | 1,000 | 671,000,000 | 6,666,667 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 12.3 | 1,100 | 671,000,000 | 7,333,333 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 11.3 | 1,200 | 671,000,000 | 8,000,000 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 10.4 | 1,300 | 671,000,000 | 8,666,667 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 9.6 | 1,400 | 671,000,000 | 9,333,333 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 9.0 | 1,500 | 671,000,000 | 10,000,000 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
1996 | FCC | 8.5 to 0.1 | 1,600 to 100,000 | 671,000,000 | 10,000,000 | MPE for general population/uncontrolled exposure (time-averaged) |
2012 | BioIntiative | 22.6 to 9.0 | 600 to 1,500 | 671,000,000 | 3 to 6 | MPE for general population to pulsed, data-modulated RF microwave radation (peak) |
2012 | BioIntiative | 8.5 to 0.1 | 1,600 to 100,000 | 671,000,000 | 3 to 6 | MPE for general population to pulsed, data-modulated RF microwave radation (peak) |
Legend
- FCC = Federal Communications Commission
- MHz = MegaHertz or thousands of times per second
- mph = miles per hour
- MPE = Maximum Public Exposure
- µW/m² = a rate of exposure for an unlimited amount of time (not total exposure in a set period of time) in millionths of a Watt (or microWatts) spread over a square meter
Sources:
- 47 CFR 1.1310 – Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation Exposure Limits
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/1.1310 - FCC OET Bulletin 65 — FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
https://transition.fcc.gov/bureaus/oet/info/documents/bulletins/oet65/oet65.pdf - BioIntiative Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
http://www.bioinitiative.org/rf-color-charts - Actual Field Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation Exposure Measurements, that compare Peak RMR and Average RMR
http://responsibleipad.com/urgent.html - Actual Field Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation Exposure Measurements, that compare Peak RMR and Average RMR
http://responsibleipad.com/truth.html#truth
FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation (‘RMR’)
Reported as Average RMR
Frequency range (MHz) | Electric field strength (V/m) | Magnetic field strength (A/m) | Average Power density (µW/m²) | Averaging time (minutes) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.30-1.34 | 614 | 1.63 | (1,000,000,000)* | 30 |
1.34-30.00 | 824/f | 2.19/f | (1,800,000,000/f²)* | 30 |
1.3 | 1,000,000,000 | 30 | ||
1.5 | 800,000,000 | 30 | ||
3.0 | 200,000,000 | 30 | ||
10.0 | 18,000,000 | 30 | ||
15.0 | 8,000,000 | 30 | ||
25.0 | 2,880,000 | 30 | ||
30-300 | 27.5 | 0.073 | 2,000,000 | 30 |
300-1,500 | (f/1500)*10 million | 30 | ||
600 | 4,000,000 | 30 | ||
700 | 4,670,000 | 30 | ||
800 | 5,330,000 | 30 | ||
900 | 6,000,000 | 30 | ||
1,000 | 6,670,000 | 30 | ||
1,250 | 8,330,000 | 30 | ||
1,500-100,000 | 10,000,000 | 30 |
FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
Translated to Peak RMR, which is at least 10x to 100x higher than Average RMR
Frequency range (MHz) | Electric field strength (V/m) | Magnetic field strength (A/m) | Average Power density (µW/m²) | Averaging time (minutes) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.30-1.34 | (1,000,000,000) x 100* | 30 | ||
1.34-30.00 | (1,800,000,000/f²) x 100* | 30 | ||
1.3 | 100,000,000,000 | 30 | ||
1.5 | 80,000,000,000 | 30 | ||
3.0 | 20,000,000,000 | 30 | ||
10.0 | 1,800,000,000 | 30 | ||
15.0 | 800,000,000 | 30 | ||
25.0 | 288,000,000 | 30 | ||
30-300 | 200,000,000 | 30 | ||
300-1,500 | (f/1500)* 1 billion | 30 | ||
600 | 400,000,000 | 30 | ||
700 | 467,000,000 | 30 | ||
800 | 533,000,000 | 30 | ||
900 | 600,000,000 | 30 | ||
1,000 | 667,000,000 | 30 | ||
1,250 | 833,000,000 | 30 | ||
1,500-100,000 | 1,000,000,000 | 30 |
*Plane-wave equivalent power density; f = frequency in MHz; 1 µW/m² average RFR = 100 µW/m² peak RFR
BioIntiative Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
Reported as Peak RMR
Frequency range (MHz) | Electric field strength (V/m) | Magnetic field strength (A/m) | Power density (µW/m²) | Averaging time (minutes) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.30-1.34 | 5* | N/A | ||
1.34-30.00 | 5 | N/A | ||
1.3 | 5 | N/A | ||
1.5 | 5 | N/A | ||
3.0 | 5 | N/A | ||
10.0 | 5 | N/A | ||
15.0 | 5 | N/A | ||
25.0 | 5 | N/A | ||
30-300 | 5 | N/A | ||
300-1,500 | 5 | N/A | ||
600 | 5 | N/A | ||
700 | 5 | N/A | ||
800 | 5 | N/A | ||
900 | 5 | N/A | ||
1,000 | 5 | N/A | ||
1,250 | 5 | N/A | ||
1,500-100,000 | 5 | N/A |
*Recommendation is 3 to 6 µW/m²; mid-point is 4.5 µW/m², which rounds up to 5 µW/m²; f = frequency in MHz;
Link to the 1986 National Commission on Radiation Protection document (NCRP Report No. 86, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields), NCRP-86.pdf, used by the FCC to set its pulsed, data-modulated, Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation (RF-EMR) exposure guideline discussed negative health consequences at many different power levels of RF-EMR exposures — at power levels high enough to heat living tissue and at power levels much, much lower than that.