Adapted from an article by Louis Slesin, PhD, June 11, 2021 | Original Microwave News article here.
In 2019, an IARC advisory group recommended — as a “high priority” — that the agency reassess the risk after the release of the NTP and Ramazzini animal studies, both of which showed increases in tumor counts following long-term RF exposure.1 The advisory group recommended that the reevaluation be completed between 2022 and 2024.
Briefing at the European Parliament
On May 30, just three days after colloquium of the German Federal Office of Radiation Protection (known as the BfS), the European Parliament held a briefing on 5G radiation and health at which Michèle Rivasi, a member from France, called for action. “It is time for IARC to reevaluate the impact of RF radiation on health,” she said.
Fiorella Belpoggi, the lead author of the Ramazzini RF–animal study, was the first speaker at the briefing. She has urged IARC to do a fresh cancer assessment ever since her findings were released in 2018.
The attack on Net Neutrality is just one small part of a much bigger, dumber plan: the end goal is blind deregulation of federal and state oversight of big telecom.
Internet users have been justly outraged by the FCC’s decision to ignore the public and repeal net neutrality rules. But few media outlets or internet users seem to understand that the net neutrality repeal is just one small part of a massive, larger plan to eliminate nearly all meaningful federal and state oversight of some of the least-liked and least-competitive companies in America.
To be clear: the net neutrality repeal itself is awful policy that ignores both the will of the public and the people who built the damn internet. It eliminates a wide variety of consumer protections that prevent incumbent ISPs from abusing a lack of competition in the broadband market.
Across Napa, city-owned light poles and traffic signal poles will start taking on a new look – courtesy of an agreement between the city of Napa and Verizon Wireless.
Micowave Radiation transmitters will start appearing on utility poles owned by the city, under a rollout meant to improve cellphone and Wireless Internet reception while creating a backbone for synchronized stoplights and, Napa hopes, less congestion on the streets below. The City Council signed off on the plan Tuesday afternoon, nearly a year after expressing support for improved cellular coverage instead of a never-built implementations of citywide Wi-Fi service.
Oppose This Unconstitutional Expansion of
Wireless into Residential Zones
Watch highly-educated, well-informed Palo Alto residents who oppose
so-called “Small Cell” cell towers in residential neighborhoods
(View from 1:03:53 to 1:10:25 in this video)
On 6/27/16, Verizon Wireless signed a Master License Agreement (“MLA”) with the City of Palo Alto allowing the attachment of antennas and other equipment (so-called “Small Cell” Cell Towers) on city owned poles in the public Right-of-Way for a paltry $260 per antenna per year.
Ninety-three (93) such wireless communication facility (“WCF”) installations are currently planned to be co-located on wood utility poles and metal streetlights. – Approximately seventy-nine (79) of these small cells are proposed to be colocated on existing wood utility poles;
Fourteen (14) small cells are proposed to be installed on existing city streetlights.
The fifteen (15) cell towers shown in the image target the Midtown, Palo Verde, St. Claire Gardens, and South of Midtown neighborhoods.
These proposed so-called “Small Cell” Cell Towers are purported to provide the City of Palo Alto with better Verizon network capacity and coverage, but are they really needed? Palo Alto already has full Verizon coverage and Verizon has not proven that there is a significant gap in coverage in these targeted neighborhoods.
Jen Psaki admitting that Biden taking impromptu questions from reporters is not something the White House recommends and more round out today’s top media headlines.
The Office of New York Attorney General Letitia James has revealed in a new report that nearly 18 million of the more than 22 million comments the FCC received during its 2017 rulemaking were fake, intended to support the repeal of net neutrality, the idea that internet service providers (ISPs) should provide all online content equally and prevent them from favoring their own services or customers over their competitors.
There have been many reports lately that Doctors and Medical Institutions are electing to REFUSE treatment. They refuse treatment because they feel they do not have to respect the will of the patient. Lately, a barrage of grievances and complaints are coming from citizens. The content is consistent in how their doctors do not care for their personal beliefs or care for their religious beliefs and say, “I do not have to treat you.”
It’s happening all over the world. The MSM has elevated doctors and nurses to a status of “GODS” and has called them heroes, yet these heroes have elevated themselves to DEMAGOGUES.
We must revisit the ORIGINAL Hippocratic Oath and the REVISED version – both of which infer to DO NO HARM.
ORIGINAL HIPPOCRATIC OATH
I swear by Apollo Healer, by Asclepius, by Hygieia, by Panacea, and by all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will carry out, according to my ability and judgment, this oath and this indenture.
To hold my teacher in this art equal to my own parents; to make him partner in my livelihood; when he is in need of money to share mine with him; to consider his family as my own brothers, and to teach them this art, if they want to learn it, without fee or indenture; to impart precept, oral instruction, and all other instruction to my own sons, the sons of my teacher, and to indentured pupils who have taken the Healer’s oath, but to nobody else.
I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgment, and I will do no harm or injustice to them. Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion. But I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art. I will not use the knife, not even, verily, on sufferers from stone, but I will give place to such as are craftsmen therein.
Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will enter to help the sick, and I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from abusing the bodies of man or woman, bond or free. And whatsoever I shall see or hear in the course of my profession, as well as outside my profession in my intercourse with men, if it be what should not be published abroad, I will never divulge, holding such things to be holy secrets.
Now if I carry out this oath, and break it not, may I gain for ever reputation among all men for my life and for my art; but if I break it and forswear myself, may the opposite befall me.
Translation by WHS
Med Students Craft Hippocratic Oath Addressing Racial Injustice : Shots
REVISED HIPPOCRATIC OATH
I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:
I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.
I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.
I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon’s knife or the chemist’s drug.
I will not be ashamed to say “I know not”, nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery.
I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.
I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.
I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.
I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.
If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.
Incredibly, from ancient times privacy and respect were key components as physicians have the power to heal and to destroy a person. It seems that physicians are now considering CHOICES on who gets treatment and who doesn’t. This was observed in NAZI Germany and Soviet Russia, where Jews, or NON-COMPLIANT citizens, were left to die. What has happened to our medical professionals?
Doctors are now FORCED to vaccinate, or they lose their insurance coverages. Hospitals FORCE Doctors to give medicine and or treatments that are not always in the best interest of a patient. Doctors no longer CARE for the patient’s wishes but what their INSTITUTIONS or other influencing operators tell them.
Last week, St. Vincent’s government told the island residents that they would NOT be EVACUATED if they were not vaccinated. In other words: Get Vaccinate or Burn.
People cannot TRUST their medical professionals. The medical professionals have now decided that they are ABOVE any archaic oath because they get to decide what human life is worth fussing over and which is not.
In essence, if you do not OBEY, you will not receive treatment. How is this even happening in our great nation of the United States of America? We have doctors refusing treatment, clinics refusing access for health based on immune status (non-COVID vaccinated people NOT ALLOWED), and simply because they said so.
WHERE IS THE SCIENCE?
Vaccines use LIVE (barely) specimens of viruses to innoculate patients. How come there is no LIVE VIRUS sample of COVID? No laboratory has received ANY virus specimen, yet the “cure” is making humans PRODUCE the virus? It’s 2021, and the information we have access to is at our fingertips. How can they obfuscate facts and try to convince people to overlook facts? Medical Doctors and Nurses have been educated in FACTS. Why are they ignoring facts for social justice and groupthink at the expense of patients?
The worse thing about this is that people are dependent on doctors for health conditions to be monitored, and these actions and behaviors are abused with the power vested in them. OBEY or DIE.
It is dangerous when PEOPLE fear their DOCTORS. It’s dangerous when the fourth unelected branch – THE CORPORATIONS – OWN your doctors. Patients are money for doctors – therefore, your disobedience is a cost to them.
“You always thought you are a consumer for the corporations. It turns out you are the one being consumed by the corporations.” #LETTHATSINKIN
How is any of this OK? Cancel culture, obey or die, and refusing to treat patients are all crimes against humanity and reminiscent of what Adolf Hitler did. History is indeed repeating itself, and the new “nazis” can’t even see the crimes they are committing in the name of virtue signaling and “science.”
Adapted from an article by Henry Brean, Apr 10, 2021 | Original Arizona Daily Star article here.
Dispute in Dunbar Spring Highlights Emerging, Thorny Legal Issues of sWTFs Being Constructed in Tucson’s Residential Neighborhoods
WTF = Wireless Telecommunications Facility of any size or any “G”.
sWTF = So-called “small” Wireless Telecommunications Facility, which may be small in dimension, but can be large in maximum power output.
An AT&T cell tower — not co-located, at all — at North Stone Avenue and East University Boulevard. Nearby, AT&T has plans to build another sWTF pole, atop the old Court Street Cemetery, which was closed in 1909.
Dozens of sWTFs — heavy-industrial equipment that pollutes neighborhoods and ruins the quiet enjoyment of streets — are being constructed in Tucson’s public rights-of-way — even in residential neighborhoods, to overserve cellular customers — with maximum power output that is often more than 25 million times higher than needed for wireless phone calls.
Tucson residents are now pushing back with substantial written evidence placed in the City of Tucson public record about the certain harms caused by these sWTFs: public safety, privacy and property value harms. Insufficiently-regulated construction of these sWTFs violate both federal and state Telecom laws. The dispute centers on the Tucson City Attorney’s “very loose interpretation” of the term co-location — which is the addition of wireless antennas on facilities that already have them. One Tucson neighborhood, now, has a seemingly unique complaint: putting up sWTFs on poles could disturb the bones of those buried beneath its streets and homes.
Biden wants $100 billion to give broadband to everyone.
President Biden introduces his American Jobs Plan, which includes $100 billion to expand broadband to all Americans.
President Biden’s $2 trillion American Jobs Plan infrastructure proposal used a broader definition of infrastructure than most people tend to associate with the word. It took on everything from roads, pipes, and electricity to climate change, union jobs, and inequality.
It also provided $100 billion to America’s digital infrastructure, with a lofty goal of giving all Americans access to the affordable, reliable high-speed internet they need to participate in today’s economy. The plan is short on specifics for now, but the vast majority of that money will go to building out high-speed broadband connections to the millions of Americans who still don’t have them. There are also provisions about promoting competition and lowering prices. Biden called broadband internet “the new electricity,” comparing the need for a federal initiative to bring it to all Americans to the Rural Electrification Act of 1936.
President Biden’s plan to connect all Americans with high-speed broadband includes proposals to boost competition, build more publicly owned networks, lower prices, and prioritize “future-proof” networks instead of ones that would quickly become outdated. In other words, the plan includes some of the broadband industry’s least-favorite ideas and is sure to meet fierce resistance from cable and telecom lobby groups and Republicans.
Biden’s $100 billion broadband proposal is part of the American Jobs Plan described by the White House in a fact sheet released today. The broadband details released so far are a bit vague, and the plan could be changed in Congress, but there’s a lot to like for Internet users.