. . . and only calls/texts via Wireless. That’s the Sweet Spot!
Click Image Below to Oppose These Two
Federal Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs) Bills
The Problem: Wireless is Toxic Pollution
From Eagle, ID to Pittsfield, MA . . . Severe Wireless Harms Caused by the
Irresponsible Placement of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities — Much Too Close to Homes
Pittsfield, MA Board of Health Votes to Issue a Cease-and-Desist Order for the Operation of a Verizon WTF Constructed in 2020.
Link to Courtney Gilardi’s closing remarks:
“Yeah, this is why we fight . . . we fight to go home and bring awareness to this problem because nobody should be displaced from their home [by the irresponsible placement, construction and operations of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs)]; nobody should have their kids vomiting in buckets in their own bedrooms or wake up with headaches or dizziness [from unnecessary, excessive exposure to pulsed, modulated RF microwave radiation]. Nobody should have straight-A kids that end up having to miss school because of this RF microwave radiation. It’s devastating, as a parent to experience this. We need to create effective protections [for residents from this toxic, home invasion by the wireless industry].“
Evidence of Wireless Harms — Feb 2, 2022 |
Expert Forum on Wireless Harms — Feb 28, 2022 |
Hank Allen & Scott McCollough (1 of 2) — Mar 29, 2022 |
---|---|---|
https://youtu.be/nEBUNwtWT-U?t=114 |
The presentations recorded in the center video provide the evidence that supports the Feb 2, 2022 decision by the Pittsfield, MA Board of Health to issue a cease-and-desist order for the operation of a Verizon WTF constructed in 2020. The purpose of the Expert Forum is to present information relating to the Board’s decision and to provide greater detail about evidence that justifies the decision. Learn more here → https://wireamerica.org/ma/pittsfield.
Center Video Features: |
The Solution: Protective Local Zoning Laws
Learn from these nine information-packed video presentations . . .
Freedom Hub Working Group — Oct 27, 2021 |
Wire America Strategies — Nov 19, 2021 |
Poughkeepsie WTF Ordinance Meeting — Aug 30, 2022 |
---|---|---|
How to Tame the 4G/5G Infrastructure Grid — July 23, 2020 |
Taming the 4G/5G Grid — Aug 4, 2020 |
Dalton Gardens, ID City Council — Oct 7, 2021 |
---|---|---|
Truth about 4G/5G Wireless Harms in Sacramento, CA |
San Francisco Board of Appeals — Nov 18, 2019 |
San Francisco Board of Appeals — Mar 4, 2020 |
---|---|---|
Friday the 13th in August, 2021 . . .
is the Day the Wireless World Irrevocably Changed.
Anyone Can Cite the Following Data and Place it — By Reference — Into Their Local City/County/State Public Records
Local Authorities’ Hands are NOT Tied!
On Aug 13, 2021, the US Courts of Appeals, DC Circuit ruled in Case 20-1025, Environmental Health Trust, et al. v FCC, the judges ruled against the FCC and remanded FCC Order 19-126 back to the FCC, invalidating the Order.
The DC Circuit judges ruled the following in Case 20-1025:
“. . . we grant the petitions in part and remand to the Commission to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radio-frequency [microwave] radiation. It must, in particular,
- (i) provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to retain its testing procedures for determining whether cell phones and other portable electronic devices comply with its guidelines,
- (ii) address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, the ubiquity of wireless devices, and other technological developments that have occurred since the Commission last updated its guidelines, and
- (iii) address the impacts of RF radiation on the environment.”
Wireless radio frequency microwave radiation is bioactive and is currently being insufficiently regulated. Therefore, each state or locality can regulate the maximum power output of microwave radiation from wireless infrastructure antennas that reaches any areas that are accessible to human beings and other living organisms, consistent with the 11,000+ pages of peer-reviewed, scientific evidence that Environmental Health Trust and Children’s Health Defense and others plaintiffs placed in the FCC’s public record: Vol-1, Vol-2, Vol-3, Vol-4, Vol-5, Vol-6, Vol-7 Vol-8, Vol-9, Vol-10, Vol-11, Vol-12, Vol-13, Vol-14, Vol-15, Vol-16, Vol-17, Vol-18, Vol-19, Vol-20, Vol-21, Vol-22, Vol-23, Vol-24, Vol-25, Vol-26 and Vol-27.
This page is one of three legs of the stool that establishes local control over the operations of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs); the other two are the US House/Senate Conference Report for the 1996 Telecommunications Act (“1996-Act”) and the stated purpose of the 1996-Act: to promote the safety of life and property.
Learn Why FCC Order 18-133 is Merely a Presumptive Order . . .
. . . which means that FCC Order 18-133, the so-called “small” Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (sWTFs) order, contains only statements of FCC preferences — it is not Federal law. This FCC Order represents massive FCC overreach and the Order cannot wipe out local code or US Court of Appeals Rulings that were developed over the past 25 years. These rulings bind Federal District Court judges to the established test of Significant Gap in telecommunications coverage and the requirement to use the Least Intrusive Means to remedy a proven gap. Read FCC Order 18-133 and then listen to FCC Attorney Scott Noveck admit that the FCC expects case-by-case adjudication of nearly all the provisions of the order.
Seminal Letter re: Doctrine of Fixtures | Link to Total RF microwave radiation exposure over time | Link to Lack of insurance for RF microwave radiation exposure | Compare 1995 & 1996 Versions of TCA