Reject World Health Organization (WHO) Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations

Please, Read, View and Evaluate Carefully . . .
then Share with Everyone That You Know


WHO World Health Assembly Agenda Item 16: Amendments to International Health Regulations: May 24-25, 2022

Hot on the heels of Bill Gates’s May 2022 book on GERM teams, the World Health Organization is drafting a amendments to its International Health Regulations re: pandemic preparedness that could grant the WHO unprecedented bio-surveillance powers.

Agenda Item 16. Public health emergencies: preparedness and response

  • 16.1 The Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee for the WHO Health Emergencies — Link to Document A75/16
  • 16.2 Strengthening WHO preparedness for and response to health emergencies —
  • 16.3 WHO’s work in health emergencies — Link to Document A75/10 Rev.1
  • 16.4 Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005) — Link to Document A75/22

WHO World Health Assembly Agenda Item 16.2: Adoption of Amendments
to WHO’s International Health Regulations — Committee A, 12th Session — May 27, 2022

Link to Children’s Health Defense Call to Action — May 27, 2022

Act now!

The sovereignty of the United States and our constitutional rights are at stake, and we must ACT NOW to preserve our lives as we know them . . .

For U.S. residents, this means that a public health emergency could be declared by an unelected officials, allowing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — or the WHO itself — to detain, examine and potentially medicate Americans suspected of being ill against their will. The WHO would have the authority to introduce surveillance systems, compliance measures and implementation of forced medical responses worldwide. This is a violation of both the inalienable rights of individuals and the sovereignty of nations. It would also remove both transparency and accountability.

We cannot allow this abuse of power.
The USA must Leave the WHO.

CHD Friday Round Table re: WHO World Health Assembly:
‘Committee A’ Adopted Item 16.2: International Health Regulations Amendments

CHD Friday Round Table re: WHO World Health Assembly:
‘Committee A’ Adopted Item 16.2: International Health Regulations Amendments — May 27, 2022

Link to Geneva Press Conference re: Nefarious WEF and WHO Plans, May 28, 202 — May 28, 2022


The Following was Adopted by Committee A of the World Health Assembly on May 27, 2022

Proposed deletions are shown in strikethrough; insertions are shown in highlight-yellow. Emphases added by Wire America.

SEVENTY-FIFTH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY Agenda item 16.2

A75/A/CONF./7 Rev.1 | 27 May 2022 | Source pdf here.


Strengthening WHO Preparedness For and Response to Health Emergencies: Proposal for Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)


Draft resolution proposed by Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, European Union and its Member States, Japan, Monaco, Republic of Korea, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America

The Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly,

PP1 Having considered the Proposal for amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005),1 which includes in its annex proposed amendments submitted by the United States of America in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005);

PP2 Recalling decision EB150(3) on Strengthening the International Health Regulations (2005), which noted the discussions of the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies related to strengthening the International Health Regulations (2005), including through implementation, compliance and potential amendments, and urged Member States to take all appropriate measures to consider potential amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), with the understanding that this would not lead to reopening the entire instrument for renegotiation;

PP3 Expressing appreciation for the work of the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies in developing an inclusive Member State-led process for considering amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005);

PP4 Welcoming WHA75.[XX], in which Member States decided to commence a Member State-led process to consider proposed amendments2 to the International Health Regulations (2005) beyond those adopted below;

[PP5 Noting Member State consensus to reduce the period for entry into force of amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) as set out in Article 59, and to make technical adjustments to Article 59 and related Articles of the instrument, to ensure coherence and consistency; DEL]

[PP5 Recalling that Member States decided to establish the Working Group on IHR amendments (WGIHR), through the Working group on strengthening WHO preparedness and response to health emergencies (WGPR), to discuss targeted amendments to address specific and clearly identified issues, challenges, including equity, technological or other developments, or gaps that could not effectively be addressed otherwise but are critical to supporting effective implementation and compliance of the International Health Regulations (2005), and their universal application for the protection of all people of the world from the international spread of disease in an equitable manner;

PP6 Noting States Parties’ right to notify the Director-General of rejections or reservations, pursuant to Articles 61 and 62, of the below amendments of the International Health Regulations (2005);

OP1 ADOPTS, in accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005), the amendments to Article 59, and the consequent necessary updates to Articles 55, 61, 62, and 63 of the International Health Regulations (2005) set out below;

OP2 URGES State Parties, consistent with Article 44 of the International Health Regulations (2005), to collaborate with each other in the provision or facilitation of technical cooperation and logistical support, particularly in the development, strengthening and maintenance of the public health capacities required under the International Health Regulations (2005).

ANNEX

Article 59: Entry into force; period for rejection or reservations

1. The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, these Regulations or an amendment thereto, shall be 18 months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of these Regulations or of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no effect.

1bis. The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, an amendment to these Regulations shall be [9 DEL] 10 months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no effect.

2. These Regulations shall enter into force 24 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and amendments to these Regulations shall enter into force 12 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1bis of this Article, except for:

  • (a) a State that has rejected these Regulations or an amendment thereto in accordance with Article 61;

  • (b) a State that has made a reservation, for which these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall enter into force as provided in Article 62;

  • (c) a State that becomes a Member of WHO after the date of the notification by the Director-General referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and which is not already a party to these Regulations, for which these Regulations shall enter into force as provided in Article 60; and

  • (d) a State not a Member of WHO that accepts these Regulations, for which they shall enter into force in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 64.

3. If a State is not able to adjust its domestic legislative and administrative arrangements fully with these Regulations or an amendment thereto within the period set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, as applicable, that State shall submit within the applicable period specified in paragraph 1 or 1bis of this Article a declaration to the Director-General regarding the outstanding adjustments and achieve them no later than 12 months after the entry into force of these Regulations or an amendment thereto for that State Party [and no later than 6 months after the entry into force of an amendment to these Regulations for that State Party DEL].

Article 55: Amendments

1. Amendments to these Regulations may be proposed by any State Party or by the Director-General. Such proposals for amendments shall be submitted to the Health Assembly for its consideration.

2. The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.

3. Amendments to these Regulations adopted by the Health Assembly pursuant to this Article shall come into force for all States Parties on the same terms, and subject to the same rights and obligations, as provided for in Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO and Articles 59 to 64 of these Regulations, subject to the periods provided for in those Articles with respect to amendments to these Regulations.

Article 61 Rejection

If a State notifies the Director-General of its rejection of these Regulations or of an amendment thereto within the applicable period provided in paragraph 1 or 1bis of Article 59, these Regulations or the amendment concerned shall not enter into force with respect to that State. Any international sanitary agreement or regulations listed in Article 58 to which such State is already a party shall remain in force as far as such State is concerned.

Article 62 Reservations

1. States may make reservations to these Regulations or an amendment thereto in accordance with this Article. Such reservations shall not be incompatible with the object and purpose of these Regulations.

2. Reservations to these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall be notified to the Director-General in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 1bis of Article 59 and Article 60, paragraph 1 of Article 63 or paragraph 1 of Article 64, as the case may be. A State not a Member of WHO shall notify the Director-General of any reservation with its notification of acceptance of these Regulations. States formulating reservations should provide the Director-General with reasons for the reservations.

3. A rejection in part of these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall be considered as a reservation.

4. The Director-General shall, in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 65, issue notification of each reservation received pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article. The Director-General shall:

  • (a) if the reservation was made before the entry into force of these Regulations, request those Member States that have not rejected these Regulations to notify him or her within six months of any objection to the reservation, or

  • (b) if the reservation was made after the entry into force of these Regulations, request States Parties to notify him or her within six months of any objection to the reservation, or

  • (c) if the reservation was made to an amendment to these Regulations, request States Parties to notify him or her within three months of any objection to the reservation.

States Parties objecting to a reservation to an amendment to these Regulations should provide the Director-General with reasons for the objection.

5. After this period, the Director-General shall notify all States Parties of the objections he or she has received with regard to reservations. In the case of a reservation made to these Regulations, Uunless by the end of six months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article a reservation has been objected to by one-third of the States referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, it shall be deemed to be accepted and these Regulations shall enter into force for the reserving State, subject to the reservation. In the case of a reservation made to an amendment to these Regulations, unless by the end of three months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article a reservation has been objected to by one-third of the States referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, it shall be deemed to be accepted and the amendment shall enter into force for the reserving State, subject to the reservation.

6. If at least one-third of the States referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article object to the reservation to these Regulations by the end of six months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, or, in the case of a reservation to an amendment to these Regulations, by the end of three months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, the Director-General shall notify the reserving State with a view to its considering withdrawing the reservation within three months from the date of the notification by the Director-General.

7. The reserving State shall continue to fulfil any obligations corresponding to the subject matter of the reservation, which the State has accepted under any of the international sanitary agreements or regulations listed in Article 58.

8. If the reserving State does not withdraw the reservation within three months from the date of the notification by the Director-General referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article, the Director-General shall seek the view of the Review Committee if the reserving State so requests. The Review Committee shall advise the Director-General as soon as possible and in accordance with Article 50 on the practical impact of the reservation on the operation of these Regulations.

9. The Director-General shall submit the reservation, and the views of the Review Committee if applicable, to the Health Assembly for its consideration. If the Health Assembly, by a majority vote, objects to the reservation on the ground that it is incompatible with the object and purpose of these Regulations, the reservation shall not be accepted and these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall enter into force for the reserving State only after it withdraws its reservation pursuant to Article 63. If the Health Assembly accepts the reservation, these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall enter into force for the reserving State, subject to its reservation.

Article 63 Withdrawal of rejection and reservation

1. A rejection made under Article 61 may at any time be withdrawn by a State by notifying the Director-General. In such cases, these Regulations or or an amendment thereto, as applicable, shall enter into force with regard to that State upon receipt by the Director-General of the notification, except where the State makes a reservation when withdrawing its rejection, in which case these Regulations or or an amendment thereto, as applicable, shall enter into force as provided in Article 62. In no case shall these Regulations enter into force in respect to that State earlier than 24 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 59 and in no case shall an amendment to these Regulations enter into force in respect to that State earlier than 12 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1bis of Article 59.

2. The whole or part of any reservation may at any time be withdrawn by the State Party concerned by notifying the Director-General. In such cases, the withdrawal will be effective from the date of receipt by the Director-General of the notification.


  1. Document A75/18.  ↩

  2. Including the other proposed amendments set out in the annex of Document A75/18, as well as other amendments which have or may be submitted by other IHR (2005) States Parties or the Director-General, including through the above-mentioned Member State-led process.  ↩

The Following is Why “We the People” of the USA Must Reject the WHO Amendments Adopted by Committee A of the World Health Assembly on Mar 27, 2022

Dr. Richard M. Fleming — Crimes Against Humanity Tour — Apr 23, 2022

WHO World Health Assembly Agenda Item 16.2:
Amendments to International Health Regulations — Comm. A, 3rd Session May 24, 2022

WHO World Health Assembly Agenda Item 16.2:
Amendments to International Health Regulations — Comm. A, 4th Session May 24, 2022

WHO World Health Assembly Agenda Item 16.2:
Amendments to International Health Regulations — Comm. A, 5th Session May 25, 2022

 

World Health Organization

Seventy-Fifth WHO World Health Assembly Agenda Item 16.2

Source pdf here.

Proposed deletions are shown in strikethrough; insertions are shown in highlight-yellow.

Emphases added by Wire America.

A75/A/CONF./7; 24 May 2022

Strengthening WHO preparedness for and response to health emergencies

Proposal for amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)

Draft resolution proposed by Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, European Union and its Member States, Japan, Monaco, Republic of Korea, United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and United States of America

 

 


The Seventy-Fifth World Health Assembly,

PP1 Having considered the Proposal for amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), 1 which includes in its annex proposed amendments submitted by the United States of America in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005);

PP2 Recalling EB150(3) on Strengthening the International Health Regulations (2005), which noted the discussions of the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies related to strengthening the International Health Regulations (2005), including through implementation, compliance and potential amendments, and urged Member States to take all appropriate measures to consider potential amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), with the understanding that this would not lead to reopening the entire instrument for renegotiation;

PP3 Expressing appreciation for the work of the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies in developing an inclusive Member State-led process for considering amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005);

PP4 Welcoming WHA75.[XX], in which Member States decided to commence a Member State-led process to consider proposed amendments 2 to the International Health Regulations (2005) beyond those adopted below;

PP5 Noting Member State consensus to reduce the period for entry into force of amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) as set out in Article 59, and to make technical adjustments to Article 59 and related Articles of the instrument, to ensure coherence and consistency;

OP1 ADOPTS, in accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005), the amendments to Articles 59, 55, 61, 62, and 63 of the International Health Regulations (2005) set out below.

ANNEX 1

Article 59: Entry into force; period for rejection or reservations

1. The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, these Regulations or an amendment thereto, shall be 18 months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of these Regulations or of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no effect.

1bis The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, an amendment to these Regulations shall be 9 months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no effect.

  1. These Regulations shall enter into force 24 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and amendments to these Regulations shall enter into force 12 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1bis of this Article, except

for:

  • (a) a State that has rejected these Regulations or an amendment thereto in accordance with Article 61;

  • (b) a State that has made a reservation, for which these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall enter into force as provided in Article 62;

  • (c) a State that becomes a Member of WHO after the date of the notification by the Director-General referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and which is not already a party to these Regulations, for which these Regulations shall enter into force as provided in Article 60; and

(d) a State not a Member of WHO that accepts these Regulations, for which they shall enter into force in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 64.

3. If a State is not able to adjust its domestic legislative and administrative arrangements fully with these Regulations or an amendment thereto within the period set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, as applicable, that State shall submit within the applicable period specified in paragraph 1 or 1bis of this Article a declaration to the Director-General regarding the outstanding adjustments and achieve them no later than 12 months after the entry into force of these Regulations for that State Party and no later than 6 months after the entry into force of an amendment to these Regulations for that State Party.

Article 55: Amendments

1. Amendments to these Regulations may be proposed by any State Party or by the Director-General. Such proposals for amendments shall be submitted to the Health Assembly for its consideration.

2. The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.

3. Amendments to these Regulations adopted by the Health Assembly pursuant to this Article shall come into force for all States Parties on the same terms, and subject to the same rights and obligations, as provided for in Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO and Articles 59 to 64 of these Regulations, subject to the periods provided for in those Articles with respect to amendments to these Regulations.

Article 61: Amendments

If a State notifies the Director-General of its rejection of these Regulations or of an amendment thereto within the applicable period provided in paragraph 1 or 1bis of Article 59, these Regulations or the amendment concerned shall not enter into force with respect to that State. Any international sanitary agreement or regulations listed in Article 58 to which such State is already a party shall remain in force as far as such State is concerned.

Article 62: Reservations

1. States may make reservations to these Regulations or an amendment thereto in accordance with this Article. Such reservations shall not be incompatible with the object and purpose of these Regulations.

2. Reservations to these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall be notified to the Director-General in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 1bis of Article 59 and Article 60, paragraph 1 of Article 63 or paragraph 1 of Article 64, as the case may be. A State not a Member of WHO shall notify the Director-General of any reservation with its notification of acceptance of these Regulations. States formulating reservations should provide the Director-General with reasons for the reservations.

3. A rejection in part of these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall be considered a reservation.

4. The Director-General shall, in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 65, issue notification of each reservation received pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article. The Director-General shall:

  • (a) if the reservation was made before the entry into force of these Regulations, request those Member States that have not rejected these Regulations to notify him or her within six months of any objection to the reservation, or

  • (b) if the reservation was made after the entry into force of these Regulations, request States Parties to notify him or her within six months of any objection to the reservation, or

  • (c) if the reservation was made to an amendment to these Regulations, request States Parties to notify him or her within three months of any objection to the reservation.

States Parties objecting to a reservation to an amendment to these Regulations should provide the Director-General with reasons for the objection.

5. After this period, the Director-General shall notify all States Parties of the objections he or she has received with regard to reservations. In the case of a reservation made to these Regulations, Uunless by the end of six months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, a reservation has been objected to by one-third of the States referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, it shall be deemed to be accepted and these Regulations shall enter into force for the reserving State, subject to the reservation. In the case of a reservation made to an amendment to these Regulations, unless by the end of three months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article a reservation has been objected to by one-third of the States referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, it shall be deemed to be accepted and the amendment shall enter into force for the reserving State, subject to the reservation.

6. If at least one-third of the States referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article object to the reservation to these Regulations by the end of six months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, or, in the case of a reservation to an amendment to these Regulations, by the end of three months from the date of the notification referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, the Director-General shall notify the reserving State with a view to its considering withdrawing the reservation within three months from the date of the notification by the Director-General.

7. The reserving State shall continue to fulfill any obligations corresponding to the subject matter of the reservation, which the State has accepted under any of the international sanitary agreements or regulations listed in Article 58.

8. If the reserving State does not withdraw the reservation within three months from the date of the notification by the Director-General referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article, the Director-General shall seek the view of the Review Committee if the reserving State so requests. The Review Committee shall advise the Director-General as soon as possible and in accordance with Article 50 on the practical impact of the reservation on the operation of these Regulations.

9. The Director-General shall submit the reservation, and the views of the Review Committee if applicable, to the Health Assembly for its consideration. If the Health Assembly, by a majority vote, objects to the reservation on the ground that it is incompatible with the object and purpose of these Regulations, the reservation shall not be accepted and these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall enter into force for the reserving State only after it withdraws its reservation pursuant to Article 63. If the Health Assembly accepts the reservation, these Regulations or an amendment thereto shall enter into force for the reserving State, subject to its reservation.

Article 63 Withdrawal of rejection and reservation

1. A rejection made under Article 61 may at any time be withdrawn by a State by notifying the Director-General. In such cases, these Regulations or an amendment thereto, as applicable., shall enter into force with regard to that State upon receipt by the Director-General of the notification, except where the State makes a reservation when withdrawing its rejection, in which case these Regulations or an amendment thereto, as applicable., shall enter into force as provided in Article 62. In no case shall these Regulations enter into force in respect to that State earlier than 24 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 59 and in no case shall an amendment to these Regulations enter into force in respect to that State earlier than 12 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1bis of Article 59.

2. The whole or part of any reservation may at any time be withdrawn by the State Party concerned by notifying the Director-General. In such cases, the withdrawal will be effective from the date of receipt by the Director-General of the notification.


  1. Document A75/18.  ↩

  2. Including the other proposed amendments set out in the annex of Document A75/18, as well as other amendments which have or may be submitted by other IHR (2005) States Parties or the Director-General, including through the above-mentioned Member State-led process.  ↩

Please Share with Everyone That You Know

Update on WHO’s Proposed Amendments to International Health Regulations — May 21, 2022

Great Reset Primer: We the People Need to Awaken and Flush the Heinous so-called New World Order

Take Important Actions, Described at These Links

Supporting Links from https://timetofreeamerica.com/revelation

http://StoptheWHO.com
http://DontYouDare.com
https://wireamerica.org/who
https://wireamerica.org/truth
https://wireamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2022-0520-Flyer.pdf
https://wireamerica.org/2022/05/biden-poised-to-hand-over-us-sovereignty-to-who/
US 2021/0082583 A1https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/04/24/12/7c8e8238f4ae9d/US20210082583A1.pdf
WO2020060606 – Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data — https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606
Biosensors in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370122/
US 2012/0265001A1https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/d1/d5/03/2cb5028a1e528c/US20120265001A1.pdf
US 2012/0228565 A1 — https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/e6/9d/c3/787a071bfff162/US20120228565A1.pdf
US House Resolution: H.R. 666 – Anti-Racism in Public Health Act of 2021 — https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/666
US House Resolution: H.R. 6666https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text

Listen to this Important May 10, 2022 Whitney Webb Interview of Patrick Wood re: Technocracy Rising

In 1974, Trilateral Commission member and academic Richard Gardner wrote an article “The Hard Road to World Order” for Foreign Affairs magazine, predicting the future of the Commission’s self-proclaimed New International Economic Order.

Gardner spoke of an “end-run around national sovereignty”, a “booming, buzzing confusion” and building it from the “bottom up” rather than attempting an “old-fashioned frontal assault.” After almost 45 years, it is time to examine the record.

In Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order, Wood traces the steps and developments that led to the United Nations’ establishment of Sustainable Development as an outgrowth of historic Technocracy from the 1930s. UN programs such as 2030 Agenda, New Urban Agenda and the Paris Climate Agreement are all working together to displace Capitalism and Free Enterprise as the world’s principal economic system. As a resource-based economic system, Sustainable Development intends to take control of all resources, all production and all consumption on planet earth, leaving all of its inhabitants to be micro-managed by a Scientific Dictatorship. Topics covered include the devolution of federal governments combined with the rise of global Smart Cities. Tools are examined, like ubiquitous surveillance, collaborative governance, Public-Private Partnerships, Reflexive Law, Fintech, including crypto currencies and the drive toward a cashless society.

The spiritual aspect of Sustainable Development is also explored as an important component of manipulation. Looking underneath the cover of globalization, Wood shatters the false narrative of a promised Utopia and exposes the true nature of the deception used to promote this new economic order. Those elite who hate the bedrock of American liberty and its time-tested Constitution have pulled out all the stops to destroy both, and it’s time for citizens to stand up to reject them.

Technocracy Rising, Front Cover — Order book

Technocracy Rising, Back Cover — Order book

Meanwhile . . . the World Economic Forum Annual Session 2022 Is Occurring the Same Week

View three key videos here.

  • Klaus Schwab — A Conversation With Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
  • Preparing for the Next Pandemic including speaker Bill Gates
  • Press Conference: Pfizer and Partners Announce Accord for a Healthier World

From the List of confirmed Public Figures Attending the World Economic Forum

  1. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce of USA
  2. John F. Kerry, Special Presidential Envoy for Climate of the United States of America
  3. Al Gore, Vice-President of the United States (1993-2001); Chairman and Co-Founder, Generation Investment Management
  4. Christopher A. Coons, Senator from Delaware (D)
  5. Debra Fischer, Senator from Nebraska (R)
  6. John W. Hickenlooper, Senator from Colorado (D)
  7. Patrick J. Leahy, Senator from Vermont (D)
  8. Robert Menendez, Senator from New Jersey (D)
  9. Pat Toomey, Senator from Pennsylvania (R)
  10. Roger F. Wicker, Senator from Mississippi (R)
  11. Sheldon Whitehouse, Senator from Rhode Island (D)
  12. Madeleine Dean, Congresswoman from Pennsylvania (D), 4th District, U.S. House of Representatives
  13. Ted Deutch, Congressman from Florida (D), 22nd District
  14. Darrell Issa, Congressman from California (R), 50th District
  15. Ted Lieu, Congressman from California (D), 33rd District, U.S. House of Representatives
  16. Bill Keating, Congressman from Massachusetts (D), 9th District,U.S. House of Representatives
  17. Daniel Meuser, Congressman from Pennsylvania (R), 9th District, U.S. House of Representatives
  18. Gregory W. Meeks, Congressman from New York (D), 6th District
  19. Michael McCaul, Congressman from Texas (R), 10th District
  20. Seth Moulton, Congressman from Massachusetts (D), 6th District
  21. Dean Phillips, Congressman from Minnesota (D), 3rd District
  22. Ann Wagner, Congresswoman from Missouri (R), 2nd District
  23. Larry Hogan, Governor of Maryland
  24. Eric Holcomb, Governor of Indiana
  25. Francis Suarez, Mayor of Miami

April 12, 2022 Source document: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf

In May 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) intends to amend the International Health Regulations to give greater control to itself and its Director Director-General, Tedros Ghebreyesus. This power grab pushes our world towards a centralized governance model of worldwide health surveillance, reporting, and management, where the people have no say. Details and steps we can take are summarized here.

Download, Print and Distribute This Flyer

Learn from These Four Videos . . . Then Read Below the USA’s Original Proposed Amendments to WHO’s World Health Regulations from Jan 2022 (Since Revised)

Biden set to sell America’s sovereignty to globalists at WHO on May 22 — May 18, 2022

Ep 142.1: James Roguski on USA Government SOVEREIGNTY Handoff to the World Health Organization — May 18, 2022

Russell Brand: It Begins — May 14, 2022

James Roguski | International Health Regulations — April 29, 2022

Look at this: ONE DAY NOTICE by Health and Human Services to Invite the Public to Comment!


Submission of the United States of America

Strengthening WHO Preparedness for and Response to Health Emergencies

Proposal for Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)

1. The Director-General has the honour to submit to the Health Assembly for its consideration, in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005), the proposal for amendments to the Regulations received from the United States of America pursuant to the said provision (see Annex).

2. In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005), the Director-General communicated the text of the proposal for amendments to all States Parties to the Regulations on 20 January 2022 via circular letter.

3. Pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations (2005), any amendments to the Regulations adopted by the Health Assembly would come into force for all States Parties on the same terms, and subject to the same rights and obligations, as provided for in Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO and Articles 59 to 64 of the International Health Regulations (2005).

ACTION BY THE HEALTH ASSEMBLY

4. The Health Assembly is invited to consider the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005).


Proposed Amendments

. . . to the International Health Regulations (2005) Articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59

Explanation of changes: The proposed new text is shown as highlighted text, and proposed deletions to existing text is shown in strikethrough text. All other text would remain unchanged.

Article 5: Surveillance

1. Each State Party shall develop, strengthen and maintain, as soon as possible but no later than five years from the entry into force of these Regulations for that State Party, the capacity to detect, assess, notify and report events in accordance with these Regulations, as specified in Annex 1. This capacity will be periodically reviewed through the Universal Health Periodic Review mechanism. Should such review identify resource constraints and other challenges in attaining these capacities, WHO and its Regional Offices shall, upon the request of a State Party, provide or facilitate technical support and assist in mobilization of financial resources to develop, strengthen and maintain such capacities.

. . .

New 5. WHO shall develop early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national, regional, or global risk posed by an event of unknown causes or sources and shall convey this risk assessment to States Parties in accordance with Articles 11 and 45 where appropriate. The risk assessment shall indicate, based on the best available knowledge, the level of risk of potential spread and risks of potential serious public health impacts, based on assessed infectiousness and severity of the illness.

Article 6: Notification

1. Each State Party shall assess events occurring within its territory by using the decision instrument in Annex 2 within 48 hours of the National IHR Focal Point receiving the relevant information. Each State Party shall notify WHO, by the most efficient means of communication available, by way of the National IHR Focal Point, and within 24 hours of assessment of public health information, of all events which may constitute a public health emergency of international concern within its territory in accordance with the decision instrument, as well as any health measure implemented in response to those events. If the notification received by WHO involves the competency of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) or other relevant entities, WHO shall immediately notify the IAEA relevant entities.

2. Following a notification, a State Party shall continue to communicate to WHO, by the most efficient means of communication available, timely, accurate and sufficiently detailed public health information available to it on the notified event, where possible including genetic sequence data, case definitions, laboratory results, source and type of the risk, number of cases and deaths, conditions affecting the spread of the disease and the health measures employed; and report, when necessary, the difficulties faced and support needed in responding to the potential public health emergency of international concern.

Article 9: Other reports

1. WHO may take into account reports from sources other than notifications or consultations and shall assess these reports according to established epidemiological principles and then communicate information on the event to the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring. Before taking any action based on such reports, WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 10. To this end, WHO shall make the information received available to the States Parties and only where it is duly justified may WHO maintain the confidentiality of the source. This information will be used in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 11.

Article 10: Verification

1. Within 24 hours of receiving information, WHO shall request, in accordance with Article 9, verification from a State Party of reports from sources other than notifications or consultations of events which may constitute a public health emergency of international concern allegedly occurring in the State’s territory. In such cases, WHO shall inform the State Party concerned regarding the reports it is seeking to verify.

2. Pursuant to the foregoing paragraph and to Article 9, each State Party, when requested by WHO, shall verify and provide:

  • (a) within 24 hours, an initial reply to, or acknowledgement of, the request from WHO;
  • (b) within 24 hours, available public health information on the status of events referred to in WHO’s request; and
  • (c) information to WHO in the context of an assessment under Article 6, including relevant information as described in paragraphs 1 and 2 of that Article.

3. When WHO receives information of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern, it shall offer within 24 hours to collaborate with the State Party concerned in assessing the potential for international disease spread, possible interference with international traffic and the adequacy of control measures. Such activities may include collaboration with other standardsetting organizations and the offer to mobilize international assistance in order to support the national authorities in conducting and coordinating on-site assessments.

3bis. Within 24 hours of receiving a WHO offer of collaboration, the State Party may request additional information supporting the offer. WHO shall provide such information within 24 hours. When 48 hours have elapsed since the initial WHO offer of collaboration, failure by the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration shall constitute rejection for the purposes of sharing available information with States Parties under Paragraph 4 of this section.

4. If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO may shall, when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it, whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WHO, taking into account the views of the State Party concerned.

Article 11: Provision of information by WHO

1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article, WHO shall send to all States Parties and, as appropriate, to relevant intergovernmental organizations, as soon as possible and by the most efficient means available, in confidence, such public health information which it has received under Articles 5 to 10 inclusive, or which is available in the public domain, and which is necessary to enable States Parties to respond to a public health risk. WHO shall communicate information to other States Parties that might help them in preventing the occurrence of similar incidents.

2. WHO shall use information received under Articles 6, and 8 and paragraph 2 of Article 9 for verification, assessment and assistance purposes under these Regulations and, unless otherwise agreed with the States Parties referred to in those provisions, shall not make this information generally available to other States Parties, when until such time as:

  • (a) the event is determined to constitute a public health emergency of international concern in accordance with Article 12; or
  • (b) information evidencing the international spread of the infection or contamination has been confirmed by WHO in accordance with established epidemiological principles; or
  • (c) there is evidence that:
    • (i) control measures against the international spread are unlikely to succeed because of the nature of the contamination, disease agent, vector or reservoir; or
    • (ii) the State Party lacks sufficient operational capacity to carry out necessary measures to prevent further spread of disease; or
  • (d) the nature and scope of the international movement of travellers, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods or postal parcels that may be affected by the infection or contamination requires the immediate application of international control measures; or
  • (e) WHO determines it is necessary that such information be made available to other States Parties to make informed, timely risk assessments.

3. WHO shall inform consult with the State Party in whose territory the event is occurring as to its intent to make information available under this Article.

4. When information received by WHO under paragraph 2 of this Article is made available to States Parties in accordance with these Regulations, WHO shall make it available to the public if other information about the same event has already become publicly available and there is a need for the dissemination of authoritative and independent information.

New 5. WHO shall annually report to the Health Assembly on all activities under this Article, including instances of sharing information that has not been verified by a State Party on whose territory an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern is or is allegedly occurring with States Parties through alert systems.

Article 12: Determination of a public health emergency of international concern, public health emergency of regional concern, or intermediate health alert

1. The Director-General shall determine, on the basis of information received, in particular from the State Party within whose territory an event is occurring, whether an event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern in accordance with the criteria and the procedure set out in these Regulations.

2. If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring, the Director-General shall notify all States Parties and seek to consult with the State Party in whose territory the event arises regarding this preliminary determination and may, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the Committee established under Article 48 (hereinafter the “Emergency Committee”). If the Director-General determines and the State Party are in agreement regarding this determination that the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, the Director-General shall, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the Committee established under Article 48 (hereinafter the “Emergency Committee”) on appropriate temporary recommendations.

3. If, following the consultation in paragraph 2 above, the Director-General and the State Party in whose territory the event arises do not come to a consensus within 48 hours on whether the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, a determination shall be made in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49.

4. In determining whether an event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, the Director-General shall consider:

  • (a) Information provided by the State Party, by other States Parties, available in the public domain, or otherwise available under Articles 5-10;
  • (b) The decision instrument contained in Annex 2;
  • (c) The advice of the Emergency Committee;
  • (d) Scientific principles as well as available scientific evidence and other relevant information; and
  • (e) An assessment of the risk to human health, of the risk of international spread of disease and of the risk of interference with international traffic.

5. If the Director-General, following consultations with the Emergency Committee and relevant States Parties within whose territory the public health emergency of international concern has occurred, considers that a public health emergency of international concern has ended, the Director-General shall take a decision in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 49.

New 6. Where an event has not been determined to meet the criteria for a public health emergency of international concern but the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response, the Director-General, on the basis of information received, may determine at any time to issue an intermediate public health alert to States Parties and may consult the Emergency Committee in a manner consistent with the procedure set out in Article 49.

New 7. A Regional Director may determine that an event constitutes a public health emergency of regional concern and provide related guidance to States Parties in the region either before or after notification of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern is made to the Director-General, who shall inform all States Parties.

Article 13: Public health response

3. At the request of a State Party, WHO shall offer assistance collaborate to a State Party in the response to public health risks and other events by providing technical guidance and assistance and by assessing the effectiveness of the control measures in place, including the mobilization of international teams of experts for on-site assistance, when necessary. The State Party shall accept or reject such an offer of assistance within 48 hours and, in the case of rejection of such an offer, shall provide to WHO its rationale for the rejection, which WHO shall share with other States Parties.

4. If WHO, in consultation with the States Parties concerned as provided in Article 12, determines that a public health emergency of international concern is occurring, it shall may offer, in addition to the support indicated in paragraph 3 of this Article, further assistance to the State Party, including an assessment of the severity of the international risk and the adequacy of control measures. Such collaboration may include the offer to mobilize international assistance in order to support the national authorities in conducting and coordinating on-site assessments. When requested by the State Party, WHO shall provide information supporting such an offer. The State Party shall accept or reject such an offer of assistance within 48 hours and, in the case of rejection of such an offer, shall provide to WHO its rationale for the rejection, which WHO shall share with other States Parties.

Regarding on-site assessments, in compliance with its national law, a State Party shall make reasonable efforts to facilitate short-term access to relevant sites; in the event of a denial, it shall provide its rationale for the denial of access.

Article 15: Temporary recommendations

2. Temporary recommendations may include the deployment of expert teams, as well as health measures to be implemented by the State Party experiencing the public health emergency of international concern, or by other States Parties, regarding persons, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods and/or postal parcels to prevent or reduce the international spread of disease and avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic.

Article 18: Recommendations with respect to persons, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods and postal parcels

New 3. In developing temporary recommendations, the Director-General shall consult with relevant international agencies such as ICAO, IMO and WTO in order to avoid unnecessary interference with international travel and trade, as appropriate. Additionally, temporary recommendations should allow for the appropriate exemption of essential health care workers and essential medical products and supplies from travel and trade restrictions.

New 4: In implementing health measures pursuant to these Regulations, including Article 43, States Parties shall make reasonable efforts, taking into account relevant international law, to ensure that:

  • (a) Contingency plans are in place to ensure that health care worker movement and supply chains are facilitated in a public health emergency of international concern;
  • (b) Travel restrictions do not unduly prevent the movement of health care workers necessary for public health responses;
  • (c) Trade restrictions make provision to protect supply chains for the manufacture and transport of essential medical products and supplies; and
  • (d) The repatriation of travellers is addressed in a timely manner, given evidence-based measures to prevent the spread of diseases.

Article 48: Terms of reference and composition

2. The Emergency Committee shall be composed of experts selected by the Director-General from the IHR Expert Roster and, when appropriate, other expert advisory panels of the Organization, as well as Regional Directors from any impacted region. The Director-General shall determine the duration of membership with a view to ensuring its continuity in the consideration of a specific event and its consequences. The Director-General shall select the members of the Emergency Committee on the basis of the expertise and experience required for any particular session and with due regard to the principles of equitable age, gender, and geographical representation, and require training in these Regulations before participation. At least one member Members of the Emergency Committee should include be an at least one expert nominated by a the State Party within whose territory the event arises, as well as experts nominated by other affected States Parties. For the purposes of Articles 48 and 49, an “affected State Party” refers to a State Party either geographically proximate or otherwise impacted by the event in question.

Article 49: Procedure

3 bis. If the Emergency Committee is not unanimous in its findings, any member shall be entitled to express his or her dissenting professional views in an individual or group report, which shall state the reasons why a divergent opinion is held and shall form part of the Emergency Committee’s report.

3 ter. The composition of the Emergency Committee and its complete reports shall be shared with Member States.

4. The Director-General shall invite affected States Parties, including the State Party in whose territory the event arises, to present its their views to the Emergency Committee. To that effect, the Director-General shall notify States Parties of to it the dates and the agenda of the meeting of the Emergency Committee with as much advance notice as necessary. The State Party in whose territory the event arises concerned, however, may not seek a postponement of the meeting of the Emergency Committee for the purpose of presenting its views thereto.

. . .

7. Affected States Parties in whose territories the event has occurred may propose to the Director-General the termination of a public health emergency of international concern and/or the temporary recommendations, and may make a presentation to that effect to the Emergency Committee.

New Chapter IV (Article 53 bis-quater): The Compliance Committee

53 Bis Terms of Reference and Composition

[Editor’s Note: Treat all text in this Proposed New Chapter IV as highlighted/new.]

1. The State Parties shall establish a Compliance Committee that shall be responsible for:

  • (a) Considering information submitted to it by WHO and States Parties relating to compliance with obligations under these Regulations;
  • (b) Monitoring, advising on, and/or facilitating assistance on matters relating to compliance with a view to assisting States Parties to comply with obligations under these Regulations;
  • (c) Promoting compliance by addressing concerns raised by States Parties regarding implementation of, and compliance with, obligations under these Regulations; and
  • (d) Submitting an annual report to each Health Assembly describing:
    • (i) The work of the Compliance Committee during the reporting period;
    • (ii) The concerns regarding non-compliance during the reporting period; and
    • (iii) Any conclusions and recommendations of the Committee.

2. The Compliance Committee shall be authorized to:

  • (a) Request further information on matters under its consideration;
  • (b) Undertake, with the consent of any State Party concerned, information gathering in the territory of that State Party;
  • (c) Consider any relevant information submitted to it;
  • (d) Seek the services of experts and advisers, including representatives of NGOs or members of the public, as appropriate; and
  • (e) Make recommendations to a State Party concerned and/or WHO regarding how the State Party may improve compliance and any recommended technical assistance and financial support.

3. The Members of the Compliance Committee shall be appointed by States Parties from each Region, comprising six government experts from each Region. The Compliance Committee shall be appointed for four-year terms and meet three times per year.

53 ter. Conduct of business

1. The Compliance Committee shall strive to make its recommendations on the basis of consensus.

2. The Compliance Committee may request the Director-General to invite representatives of the United Nations and its specialized agencies and other relevant intergovernmental organizations or nongovernmental organizations in official relations with WHO to designate representatives to attend the Committee sessions, where appropriate to address a specific issue under consideration. Such representatives, with the consent of the Chairperson, make statements on the subjects under discussion.

53 Quater Reports

1. For each session, the Compliance Committee shall prepare a report setting forth the Committee’s views and advice. This report shall be approved by the Compliance Committee before the end of the session. Its views and advice shall not commit WHO, States Parties, or other entities and shall be formulated as advice to the relevant State Party.

2. If the Compliance Committee is not unanimous in its findings, any member shall be entitled to express his or her dissenting professional views in an individual or group report, which shall state the reasons why a divergent opinion is held and shall form part of the Committee’s report.

3. The Compliance Committee’s report shall be submitted to all States Parties and to the Director-General, who shall submit reports and advice of the Compliance Committee, to the Health Assembly or the Executive Board, as well as any relevant committees, for consideration, as appropriate.

[Editor’s Note: End of text in this Proposed New Chapter IV as highlighted/new.]

Article 59: Entry into force; period for rejection or reservations

  1. The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, these Regulations or an amendment thereto, shall be 18 months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of these Regulations or of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no effect

1 bis. The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, an amendment to these Regulations shall be six months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no effect.

2. These Regulations shall enter into force 24 months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and amendments to these Regulations shall enter into force six months after the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1bis of this Article, except for:

  • (a) a State that has rejected these Regulations or an amendment thereto in accordance with Article 61;
  • (b) a State that has made a reservation, for which these Regulations shall enter into force as provided in Article 62;
  • (c) a State that becomes a Member of WHO after the date of the notification by the Director-General referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and which is not already a party to these Regulations, for which these Regulations shall enter into force as provided in Article 60; and
  • (d) a State not a Member of WHO that accepts these Regulations, for which they shall enter into force in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 64.

3. If a State is not able to adjust its domestic legislative and administrative arrangements fully with these Regulations or amendments thereto within the periods set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, as applicable, that State shall submit within the period specified in paragraph 1 of this Article a declaration to the Director-General regarding the outstanding adjustments and achieve them no later than 12 months after the entry into force of these Regulations or the amendments thereto for that State Party.