Skip to content

Wire America

Broadband via Fiber Optics & only calls/texts via Wireless

  • About
    • Beware Agenda 2030
    • Housatonic Live
    • Dr. Rima Truth Reports
    • Scientists for Wired Technology
    • Contact
    • Disclaimer
    • Update
    • How to . . .
      • How To Munge Text
      • How to Markdown
      • How to Win
      • How to Disagree
      • How to Motivate Others
      • How to Sonic
    • Tech Tips
      • Resonance
      • Effective Text Editing
      • ABC of Security
      • Linux Tips
      • MacOS Tips
      • Windows 10 Tips
      • Security Tips
  • 4G/5G?
    • Do This, Instead
    • Radio Terms Unpacked
    • RF Meters
      • Wireless Signal Strength
      • dBm = deciBel milliWatt
      • Safe and Sound Pro II RF Microwave Radiation Meter
      • ERP = Eff. Radiated Power
      • Tiny-SA Spectrum Analyzer
    • ALEC Bills By State
    • 4G/5G ≠ Public Safety
      • US 4G/5G Penetration
      • RF-EMR = MW Radiation
      • VHP = Vert.-Horiz.-Power
      • QES = Quiet Enjoyment
    • Electromagnetic Sensitivity
      • 47 U.S. Code Section 255
      • Science
    • WTF = Wireless Telecommunications Facility
      • 1999 Dr. Carlo Letter
      • OTARD = Over the Air Reception Device
      • Ericcson 6701
  • States
    • Wire-Arizona
      • Repeal HB.2365
      • Tucson, AZ
        • Tucson Utility Manual
        • Tucson Communications
        • Tucson Public Record
          • Tucson WTF Study Session, Feb 23, 2021
        • Tucson Spectrum Licenses
    • Wire-California
      • California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
      • California Legislators
      • Berkeley, CA
      • Culver City, CA
      • Fremont, CA
      • Healdsburg, CA
      • Los Altos, CA
        • AT&T Case 20-cv-00294
      • Novato, CA
      • Petaluma
      • Sebastopol, CA
    • Wire Colorado
      • La Plata County
    • Wire-Connecticut
      • Brookfield, CT
      • Hartford, CT
    • Wire-Florida
      • HB.961: Consumer Data Privacy
    • Wire-Idaho
      • Idaho Model Wireless Ordinance
      • Idaho DRMDD180
      • 2022 Idaho HB-640
        • Dominoes falling
      • Eagle, ID
      • Boise Aug-2021 sWTF Appeal
      • Dalton Gardens WTF Ordinance
      • July 2023 Dover WTF Ordinance Draft
        • March 2023 Dover WTF Ordinance Draft
      • Star, ID
    • Wire-Illinois
    • Wire Massachusetts
      • MA Open Meeting Law
      • Lenox, MA
        • 2022 Proposed WTF Zoning Bylaw Amendment
        • 2021 Wireless Telecommunications Overlay District Bylaw
        • David Maxson Paper
      • Pittsfield, MA
        • Board of Health Order
      • Sheffield, MA
      • Upton, MA
    • Wire-Michigan
    • Wire-New Hampshire
      • NH House Bill 1644-FN
    • Wire-New York
      • Long Island
      • Poughkeepsie
    • Wire-Oregon
    • Wire-Pennsylvania
      • 2021 Pennsylvania Act 50
    • Wire Virginia
      • S.1282 – Wireless Infrastructure Bill
      • Virginia Biotechnology Research Act
    • US Legislators
  • Legislation
    • HR-3557: American Broadband Deployment [Digital Prison] Act of 2023
    • Take Action to Stop The Digital Prison: HR-3557
    • HR-4141: BARS Act
    • Mobile 5G and Small Cell 2021 Legislation
    • Reading Law
    • Compare 1995 & 1996 TCA
    • 1996 Telecommunications Act
    • 1996 TCA Conf. Report
    • 1995 Communications Act
    • 2012 Spectrum Act
    • Section 230: Communication Decency Act
    • Title 47 U.S. Code
  • Regulation
    • WTF Shot Clocks?
    • FCC
      • Powers and Duties of the FCC
      • FCC RF-EMR Exposure Guidelines
      • FCC Guidelines for Cell Antenna Sites
      • FCC Order 18-133
      • FCC Order 21-10 OTARD
        • FCC Rule §1.4000
        • Case 21-1075: CHD v FCC
      • FCC Complaint 5519752
      • FCC Open Meetings
    • Net Neutrality
    • Title 47 CFR
    • Cal OSHA
    • TC95: Int’l Committee on Electromagnetic Safety
  • Lawsuits
    • 2022 Extenet v. Flower Hill
    • 2022 Wolf v City of Millbrae
    • 2022 CA Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate
    • 2021 Verizon v. City of Los Angeles
    • 2021 CHD v FCC re: OTARD Rule
      • Ruling – CHD v FCC re: OTARD
      • Case 21-1075 Amici Curiae Brief
      • McCollough-Aug 2020
      • McCollough-June 2021
    • 2021 EHT/CHD v FCC re: FCC Order 19-126
    • 2020 Portland et al v FCC re: FCC Order 18-133
    • 2019 Mozilla et al. v FCC
    • 2019 Keetoowah et al. v FCC re: FCC Order 18-30
    • 2019: CA Supreme Court Decision T-Mobile v San Francisco
    • 2009: T-Mobile v. Anacortes
    • 2008: Sprint v. San Diego
    • 2005: MetroPCS v San Francisco
  • Debunked
    • FDA – Jeffrey Shuren
    • Free State Foundation
  • Action
    • Violations & Egregious Acts
    • McCollough Advice
    • Campanelli Advice
    • NEPA Strategies
    • WTF Report Card
    • Fight Locally
    • Making FCC Comments
    • Advocacy Groups
      • Solve Corruption
      • Key People
    • Municipal Broadband
      • Redirect Rural Digital Opportunity Funds
  • Blog | Search
  • ★ DONATE! ★

Lawsuits

National Role of United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit)

2006-0501-Virginia-Law-Review-Vol-92-3Download
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Wire America, Sausalito, CA
Mon-Fri 9:00 am to 6:00 pm, PT
Contact us.

© 2017-2023, Wire America. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer

Proudly powered by WordPress